Category Experience

People Business

Bill Marriott describes one of the vital aspects of Marriott’s business – standard operating procedures (SOPs). These rules and guidelines are devilish in the details and they have helped sustain the standardized and consistent product and service offerings at Marriott. An example of an SOP is a guide setting out sixty-six separate steps for cleaning a hotel room in less than half an hour. It is an example of operations on steroids.

However, he understands the limitations of this engineering approach and makes the point that it has its place.

“What solid systems and SOPs do is nip common problems in the bud so that staff can focus instead on solving uncommon problems that come their way … by nailing the basics into place, systems allow employees to provide more customized customer service. They can just get on with the job of delivering the kind of quality attention that distinguishes extraordinary from ordinary” (Marriott and Brown, The Spirit to Serve, p. 25-26).”

He describes this type of extra-mile customer service as “stuff that no SOP can cover.” It reminds me of Atul Gawande’s point about checklists in the surgery room. Gawande shared during a lecture that the pilot who landed the plane over the Hudson river was only able to do so because he didn’t have to worry about the basics (since they were all covered) and could focus entirely on landing the plane over the Hudson, something that he wasn’t trained to do.

An excellent passage on the humanistic aspect of Marriott’s philosophy and some thoughts on service design possibilities:

“The philosophy of putting employees first is particularly important in our industry, because Marriott is in the people business, not just the service business.
What do I mean by that? When your job is to supply customers with answers to two of life’s basic needs – food and lodging – you’re touching on pretty special human territory. Even if our customers aren’t conscious of it, they have very definite expectations about not only the tangible parts of eating and sleeping – good food, a comfortable bed – but also the intangibles of those experiences: how they’re greeted, how their questions are answered, how their special problems are handled. That’s where the right human touch can make all the difference between a mediocre or poor experience and a positive, even unforgettable one” (Marriott and Brown, The Spirit to Serve, p. 35-36).

One Perspective on Information Systems

A semester has ended and I have been loaded with essays and articles on the basics of information systems.
What is information systems? One major purpose for the massive amount of reading materials was to train us to read for themes (as opposed to semantics). A thematic reading demands an understanding of form and also content/subject matter.

I hope to go back on all the readings for the purpose of differentiating as well as comparing the various ways in which a specific topic/subject matter can be explored. For example, I’d like to go back and see how the different authors understand “information,” “technology,” or “systems.”

One of the viewpoints that I find very interesting is Horst Rittel’s view of information systems. He has a lot to say about planning systems and planning information systems. I believe it’s one form of what others call the “social technical” (social technology) and his is a system that is filled with politics. In the vein of C.W. Churchman, it is a human information system that is composed of people and the fundamental elements are the values and worldviews of human beings.

I just read an article by a Libby Liu from the Huffington Post: “What are they hearing in North Korea These Days?” What kinds of information are the citizens getting and NOT getting? It’s interesting to think of the various types of information embied in various forms. There are communication channels that are controlled such as the internet and telephones. People are finding ways to work around the system by picking up telephone signals from China  as well as radio stations from South Korea to learn about what’s going on in their own country. There are also artifacts such as “Radios, issued by the state, have their dials fixed only to the regime’s broadcasts.” Even in this very common device, there is a summary of society’s politics, control, and oppression. It’s quite different from only having a few stations to listen to (in various rural areas I presume) because of the limitations in transmission service not the functionality of the device itself. There are also the interactions within the society for propogating information. Liu writes, “Through our contacts inside North Korea, we know listeners sometimes gather and listen together, and then spread information by word of mouth among friends and family.” This is a very powerful form of communication. As these intimate interactions are put together, they form an organized group of people who are building towards some kind of critical mass (article states 1 out of 24 million shortwave listeners). A North Korean defector says, “Relationships forged listening to broadcasts together are almost equal to [a] secret society that is simply not organized yet.” This is one form of an information system. Perhaps a self-sustaining, self-perpetuating, and learning from itself … or should I say, themselves.

My Gilt.com Diesel Pants Buying Experience

Just to showcase that we’re doing design work at the Weatherhead School of Management ;)

This is project #4 (mapping out an experience) and #5 (showing the emotional dimension of the experience only through color):

Kip's Gilt.com Diesel Pants Buying Experience

Kip's Gilt.com Diesel Pants Buying Experience

Emotional Dimension

Emotional Dimension of the Experience Using Only Colors